REVENUE FROM PEOPLE TYPING THE NAMEYOUR BRAND NAME202055.2%H1 202685.4%OWNED, NOT RENTEDTHE METRIC BEHIND THE 44% GROWTH
DTC GrowthMarketing Leads6 min read18 September 2026

Beauty Tech Group Grew 44%. The Number Worth Copying Is How Much Revenue Comes From People Typing Its Name.

The Beauty Tech Group, owner of CurrentBody Skin, ZIIP Beauty and Tria Laser, reported first half revenue of £79.7m on 17 September, up 44.3%, and raised its full-year profit guidance. Its results presentation says 85.4% of revenue now comes from brand-name searches, up from 55.2% in 2020. That figure, more than the headline growth, is what a direct-to-consumer founder should study, because it describes a business that is no longer renting its demand.

SL
Sophie Lansbury

Beauty 2.0 Founder - 20 years in the beauty industry

The healthiest direct-to-consumer brands are the ones where a growing share of sales starts with someone typing the brand's name. Track that share, because it tells you whether your marketing is building an asset or just paying rent.

Key takeaway

In brief
The Beauty Tech Group reported results for the six months to 30 June 2026 on 17 September 2026. Revenue rose 44.3% to £79.7m from £55.2m and adjusted EBITDA rose 53% to £21.3m, with the margin at 26.7%. CurrentBody Skin revenue rose 44.9% to £71.1m, 89.2% of the group. ZIIP Beauty grew 25.7% to £7m and Tria Laser 179% to £1.6m. US and Canada revenue rose 37.2% to £33m, Europe 48.4% to £17.5m, and UK and Ireland 29.7% to £14.2m. Full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance was raised to at least £48.5m from £45m, revenue guidance held at no less than £170m, and a buyback of up to £20m was announced. The results presentation, as reported by Investing.com, shows direct-to-consumer at 87.0% of revenue, gross margin of 64.4%, and 85.4% of revenue from brand-name searches, up from 55.2% in 2020.
Who this is for
Marketing Leads
Main takeaway
The healthiest direct-to-consumer brands are the ones where a growing share of sales starts with someone typing the brand's name. Track that share, because it tells you whether your marketing is building an asset or just paying rent.
What to do next
Pull the last four quarters of search data and split clicks into searches that include your brand name and searches that do not. Then look at what share of revenue comes from branded search plus people coming straight to your site. Write that number down and track it every quarter from now on.

The Beauty Tech Group, the London-listed owner of CurrentBody Skin, ZIIP Beauty and Tria Laser, reported first half results on 17 September. Source: https://theindustry.beauty/beauty-tech-group-raises-outlook-as-growth-continues-across-all-markets-and-brands/, with presentation figures reported by Investing.com at https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/beauty-tech-group-h1-2026-slides-ebitda-guidance-raised-on-margin-gains-93CH-4904957.

Revenue for the six months to 30 June rose 44.3% to £79.7m, from £55.2m. Adjusted EBITDA rose 53% to £21.3m, a margin of 26.7%. CurrentBody Skin, the largest business, grew 44.9% to £71.1m. ZIIP Beauty grew 25.7% to £7m, and Tria Laser 179% to £1.6m. Every region grew: US and Canada up 37.2% to £33m, Europe up 48.4% to £17.5m, UK and Ireland up 29.7% to £14.2m, and Asia up 56.6% to £9.6m.

Full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance was raised to at least £48.5m from £45m. Revenue guidance was held at no less than £170m. A share buyback of up to £20m was announced.

Those are strong numbers from a company that listed in October 2025. But the figure a direct-to-consumer founder should pin above their desk is on a slide, not in the headline.

The slide that matters

According to the results presentation as reported by Investing.com, 85.4% of the group's revenue now comes from brand-name searches, up from 55.2% in 2020. Brand-driven sessions rose to 68.9%, from 39.9% in 2020. Direct-to-consumer is 87.0% of revenue, up from 82.1%.

Put simply: most of the people who buy now arrive by typing the brand's name into a search bar. In 2020, a much larger share of revenue came from people who found the brand some other way.

That shift is the difference between renting demand and owning it.

Why branded search is the honest metric

Most direct-to-consumer brands measure marketing through return on ad spend, customer acquisition cost and conversion rate. All three are useful. All three can look fine while the underlying business stays fragile.

A brand that depends on paid social and generic search to find every new customer is permanently exposed to the price of those channels. When costs rise, when an algorithm changes, or when a competitor outbids you, revenue drops with it. The brand has customers, but it does not have demand. It is paying for each sale.

Branded search measures something different. Someone typing your name has already decided they are interested in you specifically. They heard about you somewhere: a friend, a creator, a dermatologist, a review, a shop assistant, a previous purchase. The marketing that created that intent may have happened weeks earlier and in several places at once. Branded search is where it shows up.

When branded demand grows as a share of revenue, it usually means the brand's reputation is doing more of the selling. That is cheaper, more durable, and much more valuable to anyone who might one day invest in or buy the business.

How it was likely built

The presentation offers a few clues without claiming a single cause. The group works with around 4,550 key opinion leaders, according to the slides, which points to a very wide base of people talking about the products rather than a few big names. It describes a device development timeline of two to three years from concept to market. The third generation of its CurrentBody Skin LED range, due in the second half, followed two years of research and development including clinical testing.

That is a patient approach. Many voices over a long period, and products that take time to develop and come with evidence. It is not a formula a £1m brand can copy wholesale, but the direction is transferable: fewer, better products, a large and steady base of genuine advocates, and claims that hold up.

It is also worth noticing what founder and CEO Laurence Newman chose to emphasise: "What matters more to me than the growth rate is that the business became stronger as it grew."

How to measure your own version

You do not need a listed company's analytics team to find this number. You need a quarter's worth of honesty with your own data.

Start with your search console data. Split the queries that bring people to your site into two groups: those that include your brand name or a product name that only you use, and those that do not. Look at the share of clicks in each group, quarter by quarter, for the last year.

Then look at your analytics and add up revenue from branded organic search, branded paid search, and people who came directly to your site. Express it as a share of total online revenue.

The absolute number matters less than the direction. If it is rising, your brand is building reputation faster than you are buying attention. If it is flat while your ad spend rises, you are growing by paying more for each sale, and that should shape next year's plan.

What moves the number

Three things tend to move it, and none of them are quick.

The first is a hero product that people can name. Branded demand often starts with a product someone asks for by name rather than a brand they vaguely remember.

The second is a broad base of genuine advocates. Hundreds of people who actually use your product and mention it over months will usually build more branded demand than a small number of expensive posts, because the mentions keep arriving.

The third is evidence. Claims that hold up give professionals, journalists and reviewers something they are comfortable repeating, and repetition from credible voices is what makes people go looking for the name.

What does not move it durably is cutting brand-building to hit a short-term return on ad spend target. That protects this month's figures at the expense of next year's demand.

The plain version

The Beauty Tech Group grew revenue 44% and raised its profit guidance. The more useful figure for smaller brands is that 85.4% of its revenue now comes from people searching for its name, up from 55.2% in 2020.

Find your own version of that number this week. It will tell you more about the health of your direct-to-consumer business than any single campaign report, and it is the number that shows whether your marketing is building something you own.

Share
SL

Sophie Lansbury

Founder of Beauty 2.0. Nearly 20 years in beauty — from counter to boardroom, indie launches to global houses. Writes about the operational reality of growing beauty brands.

About Sophie
“

Paid acquisition gets you customers. Branded search tells you whether they now come looking for you on their own.

Var detta till hjälp?

Related posts

CATEGORY SIZE VS YOUR LEVERAGE$2.08BNLARGEST CATEGORYYOUR LEVERAGEASK NOWTHEN IT GETS REPRICED
DTC GrowthBrand FoundersUS6 min read

Beauty Is Now TikTok Shop's Biggest Category. That Is the Best Negotiating Position You Will Ever Have on That Platform.

WWD reported on 21 August, citing Circana, that beauty and personal care generated $2.08 billion in sales on TikTok Shop between January and June 2026, making it the largest category on the platform's e-commerce arm. Most coverage will treat that as proof the channel works. The more useful reading is about timing: a category only holds maximum leverage while a platform still needs it to grow, and that window closes before the numbers do.

20 Aug 2026Read →
SAME EFFORT, TWO SHAPES12 SKUS, 12 SMALL PILESNO SIGNAL COMPOUNDSONE HERO, ONE PILEREVIEWS, VIDEOS, SEARCH+185.5%
DTC GrowthBrand Founders5 min read

Medicube's Parent Grew Cosmetics Revenue 185.5% in a Quarter. The Range Strategy Behind It Is the Opposite of Yours.

Korean beauty group APR posted its highest ever quarter on 11 August: consolidated revenue of KRW 767.5 billion, up 134.2%, with cosmetics division revenue up 185.5% and overseas sales now 92% of the group. North America grew 264.6% and Europe 380.3%. The interesting part for a smaller brand is not the scale. It is that this was built by pushing a small number of recognisable products into new markets rather than by launching a broad range in each one.

14 Aug 2026Read →
UTILITY LOYALTY · BEAUTY 2026123456VALUE = REPEAT
DTC GrowthEcommerce Leads4 min read

Utility Loyalty: What Actually Drives Repeat In Beauty In 2026

Points-based loyalty programmes are quietly losing effectiveness. The brands growing repeat rate in 2026 have switched to utility-based loyalty - and the mechanics are different enough that it is worth reading before your next relaunch.

23 Apr 2026Read →