Founder's PlaybookBrand Founders6 min read9 June 2026

Announcing the Beauty 2.0 Webinar Series: The Future of Beauty

Beauty 2.0 is opening a private webinar series for the people steering the ship inside brands. Founders, CEOs, GMs, commercial and marketing leads. The first session, "The Future of Beauty," walks through what is actually changing in the category, the operational gaps that are quietly compounding inside £500k-£5m brands, and the practical shape of the operating model the brands pulling ahead are now building. 45 minutes, live, no pitch deck.

SL
Sophie Lansbury

Beauty 2.0 Founder - 20 years in the beauty industry

The future of beauty is not the brands with the most AI. It is the brands with the clearest system around the intelligence they already have.

Key takeaway

In brief
Why we are running this webinar series, who it is for, what we will cover in the first session, the gap between AI as a writing tool and AI as an operating layer, and what the brands compounding hardest are doing differently right now.
Who this is for
Brand Founders
Main takeaway
The future of beauty is not the brands with the most AI. It is the brands with the clearest system around the intelligence they already have.
What to do next
Reserve a seat for "The Future of Beauty" on /webinars or book a discovery call if you want to walk through the specific picture for your brand.

There is a sentence we keep hearing from beauty founders, GMs and commercial leads at the moment.

It usually starts with: "We know what the problem is. We just cannot get the team to act on it fast enough."

It is the same shape of sentence whether it is about creator ROI, content output, retention, retail readiness or paid spend. The team has the read. The team is bright. The team is working hard. Something between the read and the decision keeps stalling, and the cost compounds week after week.

That gap, between knowing and doing, is what we built Beauty 2.0 to close. And it is what the new private webinar series is about.

What we are launching

The Beauty 2.0 webinar series is a set of live 45-minute working sessions for the people steering the ship inside beauty brands. Founders, CEOs, GMs, commercial and marketing leads. The first session is called The Future of Beauty, and the focus is the operating model. Not the technology. Not the trend. The actual structure of how a brand turns intelligence into commercial outcomes.

We are not running it as a pitch deck. We are running it as a working session, with live demos, a side-by-side look at how most brands operate today versus how the brands pulling ahead are operating now, and a discussion at the end about what your specific picture looks like.

If you are a senior operator inside a £500k-£5m beauty or wellness brand, this is the room. Sign up at /webinars.

Why we are doing this now

We were not planning to launch a webinar series this quarter. We were planning to keep running the audit, keep delivering the productised services, and keep refining BeautyOS in the background. The decision to open up the room came out of three patterns we have watched harden in the last 90 days.

The first is that the rate of change in beauty has accelerated past the rate at which most brands can absorb it. TikTok Shop crossed 10% of US beauty ecommerce in Q1 2026. Ulta and Sephora both shipped AI-driven discovery in the same 60 days. The ASA launched AI-monitored claim enforcement in the UK. The EU rolled the next ingredient ban wave. None of those is a small story. All of them happened inside one quarter. The brands that read each shift and acted on it are pulling away from the brands that read them and stayed put.

The second is that the gap between "we have AI" and "we have a system around AI" is now visible commercially. Beauty Independent's CEO survey put adoption at 94%. Real deep usage in the areas that actually move margin (forecasting, retention, supply chain, regional targeting) is closer to zero. The brands at the top of the curve are not the ones with the most tools. They are the ones with the clearest operating layer underneath.

The third is that we have had the same conversation, in different rooms, with at least 30 senior beauty operators in the last quarter. They all describe the same shape of problem. We thought it was worth opening the room and having one version of the conversation, together.

What "The Future of Beauty" actually covers

The session is built for working operators, not for a general beauty audience. The structure is:

A short read on why Beauty 2.0 exists, and what we kept seeing inside brands when Sophie came back to the industry last year. Then a clear-eyed view of what is actually changing in beauty right now, which is more specific than the general "AI is here" narrative. Then the operational gaps we keep finding: brands that cannot tell where growth is leaking, teams drowning in content demands, scaling before validating, disconnected data and reporting, poor visibility across the business.

Then we get practical. A few live demos against the pain points we hear most, not as a product walkthrough but as worked examples of what the operating layer looks like once it exists. Then a side-by-side: current beauty brand workflow against future beauty brand workflow. Multiple agencies, manual reporting lag, slow decisions and duplicated tasks on one side. One operating layer, near real-time visibility, decisions in hours and team time spent on the right things on the other side.

Finally, an honest read on our approach. Diagnose first. Build only what matters. Keep beauty judgement human. And an open discussion at the end with the room about what the picture is for your specific brand.

The session is 45 minutes including questions. Attendees get the option of a complimentary strategic diagnostic, a founder workshop, early access to BeautyOS or priority onboarding on the productised services.

What separates the brands compounding from the brands stalling

The single clearest pattern we see between the brands compounding and the brands that have plateaued at a revenue ceiling is not a tool, a hire, a brief, a deck or a vendor.

It is whether the brand has built an operating layer between the intelligence the team has and the decisions the team makes. In the brands that compound, there is a place where everything connects. Customer insight, creator performance, retention, paid spend, content output, retail reporting, ops. The connections are not theoretical. They are wired. The team can ask a commercial question on Monday and get a defensible answer by Wednesday.

In the brands that have stalled, the same intelligence exists. It just lives in Slack threads, agency decks, spreadsheets, WhatsApp messages and individual heads. Every commercial decision starts from scratch. Every report takes a week to assemble. Every change in the market shows up as a fire to be fought rather than a signal to be acted on.

We do not think the answer is to buy more software. We think the answer is to build the connecting layer that makes the software the team already has actually useful. That is what Beauty 2.0 does. That is what the webinar is going to walk through.

How to come

The first session is open for registration now at /webinars. The date is set, the agenda is published, and the four post-session offers are on the page. Reserve your seat, and you will get a confirmation with an .ics invite, a Google Calendar link and the join URL 24 hours before the session.

After this first session, the series moves into more specific subjects. Creator economy operating systems. Retail-readiness for indie brands. Retention infrastructure for beauty. Content production at the pace the algorithm rewards. Each one will be 45 minutes, run live, and aimed at the same audience: the people responsible for whether the brand actually moves forward.

If the framing in this post lands with you, the room is the right room. We will save you a seat.

Share
SL

Sophie Lansbury

Founder of Beauty 2.0. Nearly 20 years in beauty — from counter to boardroom, indie launches to global houses. Writes about the operational reality of growing beauty brands.

About Sophie

The biggest cost in beauty right now is not a missing tool. It is the gap between what the team already knows and the system that can actually act on it.

Oliko tästä hyötyä?

Related posts

FRONT OF PACK VS INGREDIENT DECK100%VIRGINCOCONUT OILREAD IN TWO SECONDSINGREDIENTS1. AQUA2. GLYCERIN3. CETEARYL4. BEHENTRIMONIUM5. COCOS NUCIFERA6. PARFUMTHE GAP IS THE CLAIM
Founder's PlaybookBrand FoundersUS6 min read

A Suit Over '100% Virgin Coconut Oil' Says the Oil Sits Fifth or Lower on the Ingredient List. The Claim Was in the Product Name.

A California class action filed in June and reported on 28 August alleges that Sundial Brands marketed SheaMoisture products as 100% Virgin Coconut Oil when coconut oil ranks fifth to twelfth on the ingredient decks of the eleven products named. The allegations are unproven. What makes the case worth a founder's attention is that it is not a substantiation problem: the oil can be entirely real and entirely pure and the dispute still exists, because the argument is about what the name implies about how much is in the bottle.

30 Aug 2026Read →
52 WEEKS, TARIFFS AT MAXIMUMTARIFFUS MADE22%WAS 24.5%CHINA + KOREAGAININGPRICE MOVED, CAPABILITY DID NOT
Founder's PlaybookBrand FoundersUS6 min read

Tariffs Were Meant to Bring Beauty Manufacturing Home. US Share Fell Anyway, and China and Korea Took It.

Beauty Independent reported on 24 August that in the 52 weeks to 13 June, US-made cosmetics and nail products fell to 22% share from 24.5%, and US beauty and personal care fell to 19.6% from 21.2%. Chinese and Korean-made goods picked up the difference. That happened through the most aggressive tariff regime in decades, which tells you something useful about what tariffs can and cannot move.

25 Aug 2026Read →
TWO THINGS THAT COMPOUNDREVENUE, MARGIN, SHELFPEOPLE WHO KNOW YOU0100,000 VIEWSNOT ONE OF THEMIS A BUYER YOU KNOWREACH IS NOT A RELATIONSHIP
Founder's PlaybookBrand Founders6 min read

Four Beauty Founders Went Looking for a Buyer on Instagram. The Post Is the Symptom, Not the Strategy.

Beauty Independent reported on 18 August that founders at Thread Beauty, Valerie, Pretty Well Beauty and Faace have all taken their search for a buyer or partner public on Instagram and LinkedIn rather than running a conventional process. Thread Beauty's founder said part of what went wrong was not having a public-facing founder. That is the useful detail, and it is a relationship problem that gets decided years before the post goes up.

18 Aug 2026Read →